Home : FDA Drug Database : Accurbron : Jury Verdicts

Accurbron - Jury Verdicts

______ VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - LOSS OF ESOPHAGUS - PORTION OF INTESTINE USED AS ESOPHAGUS - REQUIREMENT TO EITHER SIT-UP OR REMAIN STANDING AT ALL TIMES TO PREVENT REFLUX OR ASPIRATION - NEGLIGENT WITHDRAWAL OF GASTRIC MEDICATION USED TO PREVENT INJURY TO OPEN HEART SURGERY PATIENT WITH G.I. HISTORY.
This was a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff, age 65 at the time, who had undergone emergency coronary artery by- pass surgery, contended that the defendants cardiovascular surgeon and internist/cardiologist negligently failed to continue antacid medication for the patient with a history of peptic ulcer disease when the Zantac was withdrawn nine days post-surgically...
- from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (33082) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ RECOVERY - MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE - INTERSECTION ACCIDENT - FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY - HERNIATED LUMBAR DISC - EXACERBATION OF UNDERLYING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CONDITION.
This action arose out of an intersection collision involving an automobile operated by the 37-year-old female plaintiff housekeeping supervisor and an automobile operated by the defendant. The plaintiff contended that the defendant negligently caused the accident by failing to stop at the stop sign controlling his direction of travel. The plaintiff sustained a herniated disc as...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (31409) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ RECOVERY - WRONGFUL DEATH - TORT CLAIMS ACT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - NEGLIGENT TREATMENT OF INFANT WITH CONTRAINDICATED THEOPHYLLINE MEDICATION ALLEGED AGAINST MILITARY HOSPITAL - LIABILITY FORMALLY ADMITTED BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRIOR TO SETTLEMENT OF CASE.
This lawsuit was instituted by the parents of a six-week-old infant who was negligently treated and medicated for breathing problems allegedly associated with a viral illness while hospitalized at a United States Military hospital. The plaintiff contended, and the defendant conceded, that the infant was negligently treated with the drug Theophylline, a medication used in the tr...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (31406) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - LOSS OF ESOPHAGUS - PORTION OF INTESTINE USED AS ESOPHAGUS - REQUIREMENT TO EITHER SIT-UP OR REMAIN STANDING AT ALL TIMES TO PREVENT REFLUX OR ASPIRATION - NEGLIGENT WITHDRAWAL OF GASTRIC MEDICATION USED TO PREVENT INJURY TO OPEN HEART SURGERY PATIENT WITH G.I. HISTORY.
This was a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff, age 65 at the time, who had undergone emergency coronary artery by- pass surgery, contended that the defendants cardiovascular surgeon and internist/cardiologist negligently failed to continue p 7 3 antacid medication for the patient with a history of peptic ulcer disease when the Zantac was ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (29901) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - OBSTETRICS - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE CEPHALO-PELVIC DISPROPORTION - NEGLIGENT ADMINISTERING OF PITOCIN WHERE CONTRAINDICATED DUE TO DISPROPORTIONATE SIZE OF FETUS COMPARED TO MOTHER'S PELVIS.
This was an action brought on behalf of the minor female plaintiff, age six at time of trial, for severe and permanent injuries suffered at birth as an alleged result of the negligence of the defendant obstetrician in failing to properly respond to the signs of cephalo-pelvic disproportion exhibited, so as to effect safe delivery of the plaintiff.

The evidence adduced at t...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (31517) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ RECOVERY - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - PEDIATRICS - FAILURE TO TIMELY DETECT AND TREAT THEOPHYLLINE TOXICITY IN INFANT PLAINTIFF - SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE - SEIZURE DISORDER - CEREBRAL PALSY-TYPE CONDITION.
This medical malpractice action arose out of a course of treatment provided to the infant plaintiff for symptoms of wheezing and coughing she developed at age six months. The plaintiff contended that the defendant pediatrician negligently failed to detect Theophylline toxicity which developed during the course of the plaintiff's treatment as an in-patient at the co-defendant h...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (28023) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ RECOVERY - PRODUCTS LIABILITY/FAILURE TO WARN- INADEQUATE ADVISEMENTS FROM DRUG COMPANY TO PHYSICIANS REGARDING THE RISK OF MEDICATION TAKEN BY YOUNG CHILDREN WITH FEVER OR VIRUS - SEIZURE - PROFOUND BRAIN DAMAGE.
This was a products liability/pharmaceutical failure to warn case in which the plaintiff contended that the defendants generic manufacturer and distributor failed to properly amend its warnings to physicians to reflect that otherwise normal doses of the drug Theophylline, used to treat respiratory ailments, could prove toxic to young children who were also suffering a virus or fev...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32207) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ VERDICT Alleged negligent failure to withdraw medication used to treat chronic obstructive lung disease prior to electro-convulsive therapy - Medication heightens risk of prolonged seizures - Brain damage - Central hearing loss - Severe memory difficulties - Seizure disorder - Patient dies several years later from unrelated causes.
The plaintiff contended that the defendants internist, anesthesiologist and psychiatrist should not have cleared the 69- year-old patient until Theophylline, which was administered for chronic obstructive lung disease, had been withdrawn for approximately 48 hours. The plaintiff maintained that the medication is known to result in prolonged seizures when present at the time that...
- from The New York Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (23220) Login for Accurbron Verdict
______ RECOVERY - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - CONCURRENT ADMINISTRATION OF REACTIVE DRUGS - CIPRO AND THEOPHYLLINE - 68- YEAR-OLD DECEDENT WITH SYMPTOMS OF ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS GIVEN I.V. CIPRO WHILE TAKING THEOPHYLLINE FOR ASTHMA - PLAINTIFF CLAIMS THAT CONCURRENT USE WAS UNSAFE AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED - DEFENDANT CLAIMS DECEDENT DIED FROM PREEXISTING CONDITIONS UNRELATED TO DRUG INTERACTION.
The plaintiff's decedent was a 68-year-old woman who had a history of stroke, congestive heart failure, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The decedent had also undergone bypass surgery six years before she died. When the decedent presented to the defendant with classic symptoms of acute pyelonephritis (kidney infection), he admitted her to the hospital a...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (30816) Login for Accurbron Verdict
Looking for an Accurbron attorney in District of Columbia? Get in touch with one of our Accurbron attorneys in District of Columbia now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.

Need An Accurbron Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Has Your Health Been Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Looking for an Accurbron attorney in District of Columbia? Get in touch with one of our Accurbron attorneys in District of Columbia now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Accurbron Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Accurbron case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * FDA Drug Database: Accurbron Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.
This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.