Home : FDA Drug Database : Acetic Acid : Jury Verdicts

Acetic Acid - Jury Verdicts

______ VERDICT Hospital staff negligent in failing to dilute acidic solution to be placed upon plaintiff's genitals to permit visualization during removal procedure - deep second degree burns to genitals and buttocks area - permanent scarring and discoloration - severe pain and suffering - mental anguish.
This action involved a 32-year-old male who suffered deep second degree burns to his genitals while undergoing surgical removal of genital warts. The plaintiff alleged negligence on the part of the hospital staff in failing to properly dilute the acid solution used in conjunction with the procedure. The hospital admitted liability and the case was tried solely on the issue o...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (10857) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ RECOVERY Negligent failure to confirm contents of bottle marked "acetic acid" - Negligent failure to test strength of acid - Defendant applies 100% acid to plaintiff's genitals.
This action was brought by the male plaintiff, age 32 when he was treated by the defendant family physician for possible condyloma.

The plaintiff contended that the defendant physician negligently failed to verify the contents and strength of a bottle labeled "acetic acid." As a result, the defendant soaked the plaintiff's genitals in 100% acetic acid, resulting in second ...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (5279) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ VERDICT IN FAVOR OF NON-SETTLING PRIVATE ATTENDINGUROLOGIST - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - FAILURE TO ASCERTAIN THAT 100% CHEMICAL INSTEAD OF PROPER 3% SOLUTION WAS SUPPLIED FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH LASER SURGERY TO REMOVE PENILE WARTS - THIRD DEGREE BURNS TO 90% OF PENIS - PRIOR SETTLEMENT WITH HOSPITAL.
This was a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff in his 20's contended that the defendant private attending urologist, who was performing laser surgery to remove penile warts, negligently failed to ascertain that the preparatory solution used to highlight the warts to render it easier to remove with the laser, which is supposed to consist of 3% acetic acid, was, in fac...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32208) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ GROSS VERDICT - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - NON- SETTLING GYNECOLOGICAL SURGEON FAILING TO DETERMINE THAT 100% ACETIC ACID PROVIDED BY MISTAKE BY SETTLING HOSPITAL'S STAFF FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONE BIOPSY FOUND 25% NEGLIGENT - BURNS TO INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AREAS OF VAGINA AND LOWER BUTTOCKS.
This was a medical malpractice action in which the plaintiff, age 47 at trial, contended that the staff at the settling defendant hospital negligently provided the co-defendant gynecological surgeon 100% acetic acid, rather than the proper 3% solution for use in conjunction with a cone biopsy after the detection of pre- cancerous dysplasia in the plaintiff, who had prior surgery to...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (32343) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ VERDICT 99.9% acetic acid used to treat penile warts - Discoloration - Jury charged under Anderson vs. Somberg, shifting burden of exculpation to defendants.
The plaintiff, who was undergoing the removal of penile warts, contended that a 99.9% acetic acid solution, rather than the 4% p 7 3 diluted solution called for in the procedure, was negligently utilized. The plaintiff named the pharmacist, the nurse, the hospital and the urologist as defendants. The Court, noting that the wrong solution would not be ...
- from The New Jersey Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (19677) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ VERDICT Pharmacy Malpractice - 99.9% acetic acid used to treat penile warts - Discoloration - Jury charged under the N.J. case of Anderson vs. Somberg shifting burden of exculpation to defendants.
The plaintiff, who was undergoing the removal of penile warts, contended that a 99.9% acetic acid solution, rather than the 4% diluted solution called for in the procedure, was negligently utilized. The plaintiff named the pharmacist, the nurse, the hospital and the urologist as defendants.

The Court determined, noting that the wrong solution would not be used in the a...
- from The National Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (6616) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
______ VERDICT Plaintiff is burned when defendant applies the wrong acid during colposcopy - Chronic vulvodynia, permanent pain, emotional distress.
The plaintiff presented to the defendant health care center for a colposcopy. In preparation for the procedure, the defendant physician swabbed the plaintiff with tricholoracetic acid, a caustic agent, instead of the indicated acetic acid. The plaintiff experienced exquisite pain upon contact and sat up abruptly. The acid then migrated and further burned the plaintiff. The plai...
- from The New England Jury Verdict Review and Analysis (14764) Login for Acetic Acid Verdict
Do you need an Acetic Acid lawyer in Washington, DC? Contact one of our Acetic Acid lawyers in Washington, DC now.

Content provided by JVRA.com. LegalView is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided above.

Need An Acetic Acid Attorney?

First Name Last Name Email Address State
Has Your Health Been Negatively Affected?

Please Describe the Injury

Your Friend's Email Address

Your Email Address

Type a Message (optional)


Do you need an Acetic Acid lawyer in Washington, DC? Contact one of our Acetic Acid lawyers in Washington, DC now.

 

Close (x)

Looking for an Attorney?


Please type your question:

Close (x)

logo Find Legal Help for Your Acetic Acid Case - Submit Your Information Below

Do you need legal assistance with your Acetic Acid case?
LegalView may be able to help.


Submit your information below for a free, no-cost evaluation.

We'll submit your information to one of our partner firms.
LegalView's partners represent clients throughout the United States, for a very wide range of legal issues. Submit your information now, to see if one of LegalView's partners can help!

* Indicates Required Fields

First name *
Last name *
Email Address *
Phone Number *
()  -

State *
Legal Issue * FDA Drug Database: Acetic Acid Change
Was There an Injury?
Please Describe The Injury

DISCLAIMER and STATEMENT OF NON-CONFIDENTIALITY

By submitting this form, you agree that completing the above is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Disclosure

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website [more...]

Legal WebTV Network LLC, LegalView.com, and LegalWebMedia.com are group advertising sponsored by the attorneys identified here. It is not a lawyer referral service. If you submit information on this website, LegalWebMedia.com will submit your information to the law firms that pay for this group advertising and to respond to your requests for information concerning legal services in their assigned local areas. If there is no sponsoring firm in your state, your inquiry will be submitted to one of the sponsoring law firms on a predetermined, rotating basis. If the sponsoring law firm accepts your case, it will associate with licensed attorneys practicing in your state, if required; the sponsoring law firm may also contact other law firms to see if they may be able to assist.

The information provided by the LegalView.com and LegalWebMedia.com websites is for advertising and informational purposes and should not be considered as legal advice from the sponsoring attorneys. The websites contain general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, or settlements. LegalView.com contains information created by others or supplied through open forums; the sponsoring law firms are not responsible for the accuracy of this information. Any person viewing or receiving information from these websites should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any such information without first seeking appropriate legal advice from an attorney in your area. Legal WebTV Network, LLC expressly disclaims any liability with respect to actions taken or not taken by the recipient based on any or all of the information or contents contained in these websites.

Any information sent to Legal WebTV Network LLC through this website is done using standard Web encryption techology. LegalView.com will exercise all reasonable care, within technological limits, to protect the confidentiality of any information submitted via Internet e-mail or through this website. By accessing this website, you may be seeking an attorney to represent you or legal advice. However, none of the sponsoring attorneys represent you yet.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Any transmission of information, whether via Internet e-mail or through the website, is solely for evaluation purposes by the sponsoring law firms and their associates. The transmission of any information to any attorney sponsoring advertising on LegalView.com or LegalWebMedia.com does not create an attorney-client relationship between the sender and any recipient. An attorney-client relationship can only be created by a written, signed-fee agreement entered into with an attorney. The sponsoring attorneys will treat your information as a confidential communication for the purpose of obtaining legal services or legal advice.

For more information about the sponsoring law firms, please click here.
This form is secure and encrypted. More information about secure forms and your privacy here.